Wednesday, September 10, 2008

The Pepsi Challenge and Election 2008

Remember the Pepsi Challenge?

People would try two cups of cola, one Pepsi, the other Coca-Cola. After they tried both, they would say which one they liked better and then the Pepsi rep would reveal which product they actually prefer.

Supposedly, a lot of people were surprised to learn that while they thought they preferred Coca-Cola, they actually prefer Pepsi.

Vito asked, what if we applied that to the issues and the candidates? I know, I know -- there are other factors like character, charisma, and great hair that might impact our choice. But just based on matching issues, where do we match up with the candidates?

I found two online quizzes that purport to do just that. The first one, glassbooth.org, matched me up with John McCain (63% similarity). The second one, VAJoe's Candidate Calculator, matched me with Ralph Nader (whom I dislike quite a bit) -- also with a 63% similarity. That isn't the only oddity, either. The Candidate Calculator also said John McCain is my lowest match.

I don't know the methodologies of either. One might be correct or both might be wrong. It's still a pretty neat experiment. Check out the links below to take your own challenge and see which soft drink, er, candidate you prefer.

Link to glassbooth.org
Link to VAJoe's Candidate Calculator

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I tried both polls . . .
Now I have diabetes.

[Nader 92% in the 1st one.
Nader 87.7% in the 2nd one.]

Anonymous said...

Nadar, 87 and 86% respectively. Obama in the mid 70s and McCain below 50% in both cases. Interesting quizzes.

Jay said...

Interesting, huh? I don't know what it means, really, but interesting nevertheless.

Anonymous said...

I would rather flip a coin than rely on someone's poll questions to help me decide. If I am that confused, then the coin is probably a BETTER way to go.

Jay said...

I don't think anyone is suggesting we let an online poll -- or even a coin flip -- decide our vote. I just thought it's interesting to see where we might match up strictly based on issues.

And, as I said, we don't know the methodologies used. I just think it's interesting.